Today's hottest deals

HP ENVY 14 Sleekbook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ENVY 14 Sleekbook  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198C
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 13:27
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 63.6
33% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 107
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
HP(103C 198C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 9.4
6% 7.47 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.23 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 230 207 251 230 234 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.8% Above average
Read 133
Write 91
Mixed 226
SusWrite 231
39% 170 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 25.3
86% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 123
119% 187 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KFG/4G Adata AM1L16BC4R1-B1GS 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.2
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 9% 45 41 8 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical ENVY 14 Sleekbook Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY 14 Sleekbook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback