Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 11:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 105
2-Core 180
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 277
8-Core 278
37% 277 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.1% Above average
Lighting 61.1
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 60.4
50% 62.4 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 62
Splatting 59.3
51% 62.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 334 380 410 418 410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 400
Mixed 363
SusWrite 375
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 45.7
143% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 285
232% 329 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 125%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
28GB free
Firmware: V3.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 79 72 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 295
Write 316
Mixed 260
SusWrite 111
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 9.6
70% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 82.5
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 14.8
50% 104 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 83%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
23GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 90 115 87 112 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 89.8
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 101
54% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 8.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 32 211 58 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 3,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback