Today's hottest deals

Samsung 960QGK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 960QGK  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960QGK-KG1US
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '24 at 03:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 7.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 56.6
1-Core 184
2-Core 345
100% 195 Pts
4-Core 689
8-Core 892
101% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,256
78% 1,256 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics X8 (H-iGPU)
Sanyo(144D C892) 1GB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5007
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 66.3
22% 39.2 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 46
Splatting 55.8
37% 43.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-1T00-1004 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,983
Write 4,168
Mixed 2,954
757% 3,369 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 80.3
299% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,478
DQ Write 999
DQ Mixed 1,300
954% 1,259 MB/s
Poor: 194% Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
165% Outstanding
MC Read 70.2
MC Write 55.2
MC Mixed 73.3
189% 66.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 30.1
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 165%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 16" 1280 720 SDC4187
Typical 960QGK Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Samsung 960QGK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback