PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z390-A (all builds) |
Memory | 52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20211102 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 26 '24 at 01:23 |
Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i9-9900KF-$299
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
|
78.1%
Very good
|
82% 154 Pts
|
83% 688 Pts
|
80% 1,289 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
112%
Outstanding
|
119% 142 fps
|
106% 134 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 312 308 305 304 345 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
77% 343 MB/s
|
115% 42.6 MB/s
|
212% 311 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Portable 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 108 109 106 110 106 MB/s
|
54.2%
Above average
|
63% 85.1 MB/s
|
156% 1.47 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
53.5%
Above average
|
56% 19.6 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27% | 45% | 29 | 214 | 59 | 180 | 27" | 1280 720 | HGC2700 CR270C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $223Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 9,543x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $385Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 6,447x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $135Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 4,284x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 2,031x |
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 1,965x |
RTX 3080Nvidia $792Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1,662x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $927 |