Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Colorful BATTLE-AX B560M-D PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results to profile Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful BATTLE-AX B560M-D PRO  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful BATTLE-AX B560M-D PRO
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210928
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 21:36
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 665
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 81.2%
 Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
HP(103C 2B63) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.9
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 20.1
17% 19.5 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.3
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑
This bench: 17%
 Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB
98GB free
Firmware: V4.25.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 321 189 135 235 302 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.3% Above average
Read 122
Write 185
Mixed 217
SusWrite 244
44% 192 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 15.6
96% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 25.9
59% 120 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑
This bench: 55.3%
 Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 154 166 179 180 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 150
Write 161
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 162
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 89.4%
 Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.7% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 62.7%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 BNQ78D9 BenQ GW2470
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical BATTLE-AX B560M-D PRO Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

System: Colorful BATTLE-AX B560M-D PRO

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel  $226Bench 93%, 44,448 samples21x
Core i5-10400FIntel  $94Bench 85%, 153,026 samples15x
Core i3-10100FIntel  $69Bench 80%, 39,812 samples7x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $281Bench 100%, 447,556 samples19x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples6x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $225Bench 71%, 428,800 samples5x
SSD
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples13x
SNVS1000G 1TBKingstonBench 178%, 18,978 samples11x
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GBBench 66%, 1,084 samples4x
RAM
Ltd CVPC08G3200D4R8 2x8GBColorfulBench 84%, 50 samples16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $33Bench 84%, 32,187 samples4x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback