Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14F1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Summit E14FlipEvo A13MT
MotherboardMSI MS-14F1  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240328
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 19:33
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 61.3
1-Core 197
2-Core 388
109% 215 Pts
4-Core 735
8-Core 1,116
115% 925 Pts
64-Core 1,554
96% 1,554 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 131F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 27.6
18% 26.5 fps
MRender 27.1
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 23.6
22% 27.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
808GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1072 1208 1273 1816 1787 1811 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,980
Write 1,642
Mixed 1,739
SusWrite 1,494
437% 1,964 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 33.4
134% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 217
212% 356 MB/s
Poor: 196%
This bench: 270%
Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
127% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 54.9
MC Mixed 47.5
142% 49.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 23.6
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 127%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 56 60 14" 1280 720 AUO7F9A
Typical MS-14F1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-14F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback