Today's hottest deals

Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 18:29
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 186
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 419
56% 417 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
ASRock(1849 5039) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 29.6
18% 26.2 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 20
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 124 19 128 21 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 465
Write 353
Mixed 202
SusWrite 72.7
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 33.8
121% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 11.2
35% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
153GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 103 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 81
SusWrite 104
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23" 1280 720 ACI23C4 ASUS VC239
Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $616
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback