Today's hottest deals

Samsung 960XFG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 960XFG  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP960XFG-KC2NL
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 17:35
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 43.8
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 195
59% 112 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 523
49% 409 Pts
64-Core 930
58% 930 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C886) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 21.9
19% 24.1 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 18.3
21% 26.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDSN740-SDDPNQD-512G-1004 512GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73100004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2083 1838 1818 1602 1722 1667 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,268
Write 1,435
Mixed 1,207
SusWrite 1,788
323% 1,425 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 51
150% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 697
517% 687 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 238%
Great: 433%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3KL8L80CM-MGCT 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
129% Outstanding
MC Read 45.9
MC Write 63.5
MC Mixed 49.4
151% 52.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 129%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 50 60 16" 1280 720 SDC4185
Typical 960XFG Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Samsung 960XFG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback