Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110502
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 13:56
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 96.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 221
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 567
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 101
Parallax 60.3
50% 74.5 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 57.2
Splatting 54.9
48% 60 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 102 115 94 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 150
Write 116
Mixed 128
SusWrite 100
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 23.1
84% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 78.2
69% 104 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 61%
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
225GB free
Firmware: 10.02E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 59 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 57.2
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 59
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$23
589GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 174 173 175 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 130
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 174
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
698GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 105 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 94.4
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 105
67% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 19.3
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 50.9
79% 50.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 18 165 27" 1920 1017 AUS27C3 ASUS VG27V
Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback