Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive317% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 13:02
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 194
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 366
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6
3% 3.97 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN580 500GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2022 2032 2044 1975 2012 1989 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 1,843
Write 2,119
Mixed 1,861
SusWrite 2,012
443% 1,959 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 62.2
214% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,338
DQ Write 1,110
DQ Mixed 1,213
912% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 238%
This bench: 317%
Great: 499%
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$49
84GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 392 361 372 372 372 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 407
Mixed 420
SusWrite 376
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 47.6
154% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$54
283GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 375 374 366 361 363 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 417
Mixed 400
SusWrite 371
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 46.5
151% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 130%
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB
90GB free
Firmware: H201230a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 347 53 52 53 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 462
Write 425
Mixed 358
SusWrite 154
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 37
133% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 192
152% 206 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 104%
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB
51GB free
Firmware: 08.05J08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 38 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 53.4
Write 33.7
Mixed 31.3
SusWrite 38.5
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.3
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23" 1280 720 HWP3063 HP E231
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback