Today's hottest deals

Asus X442UR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X442UR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X442UR
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220117
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 07:55
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 94.6
49% 75.6 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 141
21% 153 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 14BE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.3
5% 4.83 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.7
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$40
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 15.9
Write 230
Mixed 7.7
20% 84.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
4% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
417GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 103 113 107 114 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 149
Write 143
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 108
134% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.2% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 6.2
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 7 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN1487
Typical X442UR Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X442UR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback