Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-44

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics40.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-44  (all builds)
MotherboardRO Stonic_RNS
Memory33.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 03:29
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 264
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 827
81% 665 Pts
64-Core 1,122
70% 1,122 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 1447) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1785 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.3% Average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 47.4
41% 56.9 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 45.3
Splatting 42.3
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 679 399 193 165 157 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,570
Write 1,565
Mixed 1,198
SusWrite 292
258% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 52
170% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 727
544% 735 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 166%
Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMS4WEC8C1K0446FCG Kingston KF3200C20S4/32GX 39GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 203 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3230 AG323FWG3R3
Typical Nitro AN515-44 Builds (Compare 1,535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-44

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback