Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-58  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Jimny_ADH
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 23:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 47.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 300
86% 170 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 726
78% 620 Pts
64-Core 968
60% 968 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 159C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 22.3
Parallax 20
14% 19.7 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 0.3
8% 11.5 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2219 1181 623 667 688 704 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 2789
Write 871
Mixed 1,868
SusWrite 1,014
362% 1,636 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 80.1
243% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 848
648% 879 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 290%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4S2S1MF-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 4 144 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1521
Typical Nitro AN515-58 Builds (Compare 4,649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN515-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback