Today's hottest deals

Microtech CoreBook Lite

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrotech CoreBook Lite  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrotech CBL15D
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 22:34
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5030
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 62.3
27% 44.8 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 107
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 1.2
1% 1 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1
1% 1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R840H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 312
Write 318
Mixed 286
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 26
72% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 140
100% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 22 60 15.5" 1280 720 GJX0704
Typical CoreBook Lite Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Microtech CoreBook Lite

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback