Today's hottest deals

AZW SEi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAZW SEi  (all builds)
MotherboardAZW SEi
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 21:24
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 58.8
2-Core 112
48% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 198
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 12.4
8% 11 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.2
Splatting 10.3
9% 11 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,318
Write 852
Mixed 804
219% 991 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 54.6
178% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 336
251% 332 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
VendorCo ProductCode 1TB
977GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.7
Write 29.8
Mixed 12
30% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FT 859B CT16G4SFS832A.C8FB 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.1% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 20
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 24 60 27" 1280 720 ACR0B2E KB272
Typical SEi Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: AZW SEi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback