Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 11:55
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 742
80% 634 Pts
64-Core 821
51% 821 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.9% Good
Lighting 91.4
Reflection 90.7
Parallax 78.8
74% 87 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 75
61% 74.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 443 399 334 418 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 343
Write 342
Mixed 278
SusWrite 409
78% 343 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 45.1
139% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 145
165% 282 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 115%
Samsung PSSD T7 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 361 362 355 356 368 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 288
Write 331
Mixed 300
SusWrite 360
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 25.2
82% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 194
144% 190 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 100%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
16GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 160
Write 115
Mixed 80.5
140% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.8
253% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$69
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 21.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.3
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 7 75 21.5" 1280 720 AUS22A1 ASUS VP228
Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $737
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback