Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-V3  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 11:27
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 143
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 282
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 21.6
16% 19.7 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 16.3
17% 21 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 18 19 18 20 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 56%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
123GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 108 95 106 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 110
Write 113
Mixed 102
SusWrite 105
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 4 60 18.9" 1440 900 ACI19AB VW195
Typical H81M-V3 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback