Today's hottest deals

HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-s0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemHP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-s0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8BD5
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240215
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 10:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 65
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 158
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 537
50% 417 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
HP(103C 8BD5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.34.06
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.2% Poor
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 25.7
28% 26.1 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 44.1
Splatting 42.5
29% 34.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 1048 411 419 423 419 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,669
Write 1,319
Mixed 1,179
SusWrite 650
269% 1,204 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 50.8
167% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 496
342% 438 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 177%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTC4C10163S1SC56BD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 43.9
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 37.8
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 40.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 127%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 31 144 16" 1536 793 BOE0B9F
Typical Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-s0xxx Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

System: HP Victus by HP Gaming Laptop 16-s0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback