Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210906
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 08:27
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$130
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 87.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 316
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 843
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 239
Reflection 214
Parallax 209
194% 221 fps
MRender 245
Gravity 159
Splatting 128
139% 177 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 161%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 322 277 279 268 247 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 479
Mixed 376
SusWrite 310
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 58.5
200% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
708GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 108 110 108 110 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 181
Write 171
Mixed 93.6
SusWrite 109
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.8
9% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 23%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$169
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1712 1381 1332 1322 1433 1443 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,573
Write 2,383
Mixed 1,915
SusWrite 1437
466% 2,077 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 88.4
298% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,297
DQ Write 1,007
DQ Mixed 1,094
834% 1,133 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 334%
Great: 435%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 92 97 98 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 118
Write 102
Mixed 100
SusWrite 96.2
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 67%
WD My Passport 2627 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 97 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 70.2
Write 105
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 96.1
121% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.7
268% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 34.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.3
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 29.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 240 27" 2560 1377 SAM105C LC27G7xT
Typical GA-B550M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 4,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $411
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback