Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 123%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory81.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240717
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 24 '24 at 05:17
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$575
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 29.4
1-Core 189
2-Core 358
93% 192 Pts
4-Core 702
8-Core 1,261
118% 982 Pts
64-Core 3,301
204% 3,301 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Asus(1043 8818) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 560.70
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 119
Parallax 124
107% 125 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 105
Splatting 92.1
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
17GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 473
Mixed 428
104% 467 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 36.5
131% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 363
275% 369 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 115%
WD Blue SA510 2.5 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 530309WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 437 443 433 421 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 433
Mixed 410
SusWrite 435
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 48.4
158% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 118
147% 260 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 110%
Great: 123%
SHGS31-1000GS-2 1TB
91GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 461 461 463 421 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 473
Mixed 417
SusWrite 453
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 77.2
4K Mixed 37
129% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 360
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 183 179 179 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH96GX5M2B6400C32 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 59.5
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 43.8
135% 47.2 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 255
16% 255 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 118%
Great: 248%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 27.6" 1280 720 ONN0000 100027813
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 423%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 534%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $2,670
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback