Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211224
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJul 23 '24 at 20:43
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 66.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 216
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 435
58% 434 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.20.02
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 19.6
11% 15.8 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 12.9
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg6aznv512g TOSHIBA 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5108AGLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1424 798 806 818 816 820 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,886
Write 2,010
Mixed 1,441
SusWrite 913
351% 1,563 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 62
205% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 741
DQ Mixed 854
638% 851 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 233%
Great: 257%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.C8FE 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.6% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 19.6
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 17.1
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 19.5" 1600 837 HPN3631 HP P204
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback