Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive450% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Vector GP76 12UGS
MotherboardMSI MS-17K4  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220111
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJul 23 '24 at 20:19
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 192
2-Core 372
110% 212 Pts
4-Core 693
8-Core 1,145
112% 919 Pts
64-Core 1,902
118% 1,902 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
MSI(1462 1324) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2901
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 206
Parallax 128
121% 161 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 132
Splatting 121
116% 146 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 115%
Great: 135%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00B00 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXB7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3179 2974 2790 2667 2673 2690 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
450% Outstanding
Read 2,284
Write 2,198
Mixed 2,457
SusWrite 2,829
552% 2,442 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 114
374% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 1,749
DQ Write 1,386
DQ Mixed 1,529
1,154% 1,554 MB/s
Poor: 225%
This bench: 450%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43EB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 31.5
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 27.3
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 360 17.3" 1920 1057 SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08
Typical MS-17K4 Builds (Compare 1,700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-17K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback