Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics44.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMACHINIST
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-RS9
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 23 '24 at 15:24
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 163
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 622
55% 466 Pts
64-Core 1,225
76% 1,225 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
44.8% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 61.3
Parallax 77.5
45% 64.6 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 46.8
45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ne-128 2280 128GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S0390
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1158 919 41 37 44 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 1,343
Write 1,116
Mixed 881
SusWrite 374
207% 928 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 42.8
142% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 306
285% 446 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 144%
Great: 191%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TRONOS-8GB-2400 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66% Good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 21
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 19.5" 1600 837 AOC2001 20E1W
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback