Today's hottest deals

Alienware 17 R4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware 17 R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 17 R4
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 14:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 575
56% 462 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Dell(1028 0777) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 140
Parallax 129
103% 132 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 130
Splatting 116
99% 121 fps
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 149%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY74D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,811
Write 942
Mixed 888
266% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 83.4
4K Mixed 56.5
181% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 514
DQ Mixed 575
429% 570 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 259%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
114GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3W0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 74 74 74 73 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 90.6
Write 95.8
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 74.1
51% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K821PJ-MID 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 21.4
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 17.3" 1280 720 SHP1446
Typical 17 R4 Builds (Compare 2,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Alienware 17 R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback