Today's hottest deals

Viglen VIG644M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemViglen VIG644M  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H61M-P31/W8 (MS-7788)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140303
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 09:52
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 142
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 206
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.7
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 3
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 97 93 89 93 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.1% Above average
Read 243
Write 119
Mixed 137
SusWrite 94.5
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 22.9
94% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 139
109% 153 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
378GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 159 159 158 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 130
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 159
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
64GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 75 75 74 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 76.3
Write 74.9
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 75.3
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical VIG644M Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Viglen VIG644M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback