Today's hottest deals

HC HCAR5000-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHC HCAR5000-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR5000-MI
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 22 '24 at 04:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 71.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 270
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 778
78% 632 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.7.1
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 25.4
14% 20.2 fps
MRender 13.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 20
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM6A1 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12544
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1673 1558 1699 1543 971 990 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,795
Write 2,149
Mixed 1,692
SusWrite 1,406
397% 1,760 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 60.3
193% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 611
557% 864 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 262%
Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FD4AS3200C8GZH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM734D QCQ90
Typical HCAR5000-MI Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HC HCAR5000-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback