Today's hottest deals

Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '24 at 16:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
42.3% Average
Memory 50.1
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 128
46% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 203
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 12.8
4% 7.8 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 6.4
5% 6.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050DLE630 500GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 111 125 135 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 143
Write 151
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 128
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
180GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 66 65 65 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 45.9
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 65.7
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston termiter 9.A01LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 40: 0P 4R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 36% 39 96 56 60 18.9" 1280 720 GSM4BA8 W1954
Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback