Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive285% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 21 '24 at 15:23
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 66.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 277
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 937
89% 735 Pts
64-Core 1,402
87% 1,402 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
Zotac(19DA D630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Lighting 104
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 90.8
84% 92.9 fps
MRender 85.9
Gravity 73
Splatting 65.5
60% 74.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1664 1689 1756 1763 1759 1739 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 1987
Write 1,589
Mixed 1,387
SusWrite 1,728
376% 1,673 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 45.2
210% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 566
506% 756 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 285%
Great: 352%
Intenso SSD 128GB
6GB free
Firmware: R0522A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 498
Write 391
Mixed 414
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 9.2
66% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 1
64% 147 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 91%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
0GB free
Firmware: UE450000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 429
Write 207
Mixed 222
63% 286 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 14.2
47% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 47.7
DQ Mixed 19.5
19% 28.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$56
19GB free
Firmware: 58.01D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 51 50 50 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 50.9
Write 43.2
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 51.2
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 22.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 216 59 60 23.8" 1920 1009 SAM7115 S24A31x
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $444
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback