Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141029
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateJul 21 '24 at 03:41
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 53.8
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 66.6
33% 51.7 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 381A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 4.8
2% 4.13 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 90 77 51 80 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 94.3
Write 92
Mixed 50
SusWrite 70.1
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
3GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 5.9 6.2 7.2 9.2 8.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston 9905469-143.A00LF 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 24 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN1487
Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback