Today's hottest deals

Biostar H610MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics5.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H610MH  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211210
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJul 20 '24 at 21:57
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 70.4
1-Core 170
2-Core 345
101% 195 Pts
4-Core 650
8-Core 953
100% 801 Pts
64-Core 1,190
74% 1,190 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Biostar(1565 111A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4953
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 8
6% 9.47 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 9.3
Splatting 0.4
5% 6.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 512GB 512GB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 73 53 64 108 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 434
Write 411
Mixed 361
SusWrite 100
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 29.3
143% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 43.2
79% 150 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM3200HLG-8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 23.8" 1920 1080 LEN66AE D24-20
Typical H610MH Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Biostar H610MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback