Today's hottest deals

Peladn HA-4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPeladn HA-4  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN HA-4
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '24 at 18:33
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 60.5
1-Core 195
2-Core 389
109% 215 Pts
4-Core 756
8-Core 1,305
125% 1,030 Pts
64-Core 1517
94% 1517 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.1% Average
Lighting 48.3
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 66.3
39% 42.3 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 85.8
47% 53 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8SEP4512N-A0 512GB
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM01100
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,979
Write 1,276
Mixed 1,225
330% 1,493 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 41.6
199% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 432
411% 621 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 247%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 134GB
123GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.9
Write 7.5
Mixed 11.7
14% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 5.3
357% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46S5.C8D 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 23
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25.7
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 24.4
SC Mixed 22
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 52 60 27" 1280 720 SPT0ABF Sceptre F27
Typical HA-4 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Peladn HA-4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback