Today's hottest deals

Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '24 at 12:11
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$56
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 342
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.5% Very good
Lighting 86.7
Reflection 89.9
Parallax 81.4
71% 86 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 72.5
70% 88 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 40 57 47 8.9 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 439
Write 142
Mixed 127
SusWrite 41.4
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 18.3
73% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 65.7
DQ Mixed 36
41% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
49GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 65 64 105 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55% Above average
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 79.5
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
153GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 129 129 123 130 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 126
Write 133
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 128
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.8
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 9 60 52" 1280 720 TSB0030 TOSHIBA
Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,993 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $829
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback