PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3P (all builds) |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090619 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 17 '24 at 20:05 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | AUT-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
54.5%
Above average
|
48% 75.8 Pts
|
26% 193 Pts
|
12% 188 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.2%
Average
|
45% 52.2 fps
|
38% 45.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Sandisk X300 2.5 7MM 128GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3520012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 157 143 174 169 172 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
42% 189 MB/s
|
100% 34.7 MB/s
|
36% 53.3 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
253GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 68 72 71 68 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
65% 88.2 MB/s
|
95% 0.8 MB/s
|
|
![]() Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
172GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 68 71 72 68 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
45% 60.8 MB/s
|
141% 1 MB/s
|
|
![]() Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
90GB free
Firmware: FH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 88 88 90 90 89 MB/s
|
52.1%
Above average
|
60% 82 MB/s
|
127% 0.87 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
21.7%
Poor
|
19% 6.73 GB/s
|
19% 6.67 GB/s
|
45% 88.5 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | DELA059 DELL ST2210 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 10x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $194Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 6x |
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 5x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 4x |
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 40% - Below average | Total price: $401 |