Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 65W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 65W  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 829A
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231208
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 14 '24 at 13:47
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$72
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 219
74% 135 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 427
57% 428 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 829A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 7.5
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 299 304 301 291 306 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 465
Write 304
Mixed 253
SusWrite 300
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 29.9
109% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 243
206% 303 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.1% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 24.1" 1280 720 HPN3462 HP E243i
Typical EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 65W Builds (Compare 525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G3 DM 65W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $72
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback