Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '24 at 10:41
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 261
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 801
79% 646 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 190
Parallax 178
137% 179 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 169
Splatting 123
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 460
Write 474
Mixed 399
99% 445 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 37.5
138% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 307
224% 289 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
83GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 134 106 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 480
Write 285
Mixed 340
SusWrite 164
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 38.6
148% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 200
175% 259 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 100%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
235GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2144 1783 1769 1776 1774 1778 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,460
Write 2,322
Mixed 2,235
SusWrite 1,837
498% 2,213 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 87.2
283% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 998
DQ Write 758
DQ Mixed 858
647% 872 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 338%
Great: 477%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
666GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 128 125 125 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 122
Write 142
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 125
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26.1
66% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 25.4
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 33.1" 2560 1369 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 8,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $638
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback