Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '24 at 10:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 128
59% 94 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 219
27% 206 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$150
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.Q1
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 196
Parallax 215
96% 176 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 138
Splatting 93.9
92% 115 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 92 63 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 178
Write 127
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 79.7
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 17.4
63% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.9
DQ Write 31
DQ Mixed 19.9
17% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$75
496GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 93 69 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 115
Write 99.7
Mixed 52
SusWrite 82.3
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 131 134 132 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 144
Write 144
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 131
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 14.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 18 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7F3E BenQ XL2430T
Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback