Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_F513EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_F513EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513EA
Memory0.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210727
Uptime28.9 Days
Run DateJul 14 '24 at 03:47
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 58.8
1-Core 141
2-Core 274
83% 158 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 647
65% 531 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1432) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17
Parallax 23
14% 19.2 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 25.9
Splatting 0.3
10% 13.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 193 117 120 116 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 847
Write 752
Mixed 799
SusWrite 161
143% 640 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 52.2
183% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 558
403% 528 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 123%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 20.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 15.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_F513EA Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EA_F513EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback