Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '24 at 00:12
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 217
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 691
66% 545 Pts
64-Core 842
52% 842 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153
CLim: 300 MHz, MLim: 150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 9.3
5% 7.8 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.8
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,751
Write 2,015
Mixed 1,792
415% 1,853 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 64.2
225% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 734
557% 753 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
377GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 135 139 136 128 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 162
Write 163
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 136
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G4
Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $563
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback