Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 18:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 70.3
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 175
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 435
43% 349 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 18.1
10% 14 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 12.3
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
714GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8J41100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 677 719 626 944 1438 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,458
Write 1532
Mixed 1,176
SusWrite 864
283% 1,258 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 31.6
153% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 589
445% 607 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 184%
Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 13 60 15.5" 1536 864 NCP002D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $66
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback