Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics7.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210311
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 17:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Memory 29
1-Core 11.1
2-Core 25.5
15% 21.9 Pts
4-Core 57.1
8-Core 89.5
9% 73.3 Pts
64-Core 81.7
5% 81.7 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.99% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 15.5
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 12.1
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.99%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
714GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8J41100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 263 323 298 283 303 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.9% Poor
Read 97.3
Write 233
Mixed 281
SusWrite 276
51% 222 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 5.2
16% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 246%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 439
9% 439 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 13 60 15.5" 1280 720 NCP002D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $37
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback