Today's hottest deals

MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 14:54
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 74.2
2-Core 136
56% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 211
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 61%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 291 212 209 192 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 443
Write 312
Mixed 340
SusWrite 238
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 26
93% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 87.5
83% 137 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown YXS1866C10D3/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 12
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 0" 1280 720
Typical FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback