Today's hottest deals

Asrock B550M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B550M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 12:28
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4300G Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 62.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 237
76% 142 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 582
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 1636) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 14
Parallax 20.3
13% 16.6 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 17.3
Splatting 17.8
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02106
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1768
Write 1,611
Mixed 1308
348% 1,562 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 38.5
168% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 563
466% 669 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 160
Mixed 80.9
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 18.7
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical B550M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B550M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $411
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback