Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82S0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82S0  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220415
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 07:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 71.1
1-Core 177
2-Core 347
103% 198 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 908
99% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,334
83% 1,334 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Legend(17AA 3AE6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2122 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.9% Good
Lighting 93.2
Reflection 88.3
Parallax 84.9
76% 88.8 fps
MRender 76.3
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 67.3
58% 71.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 75%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1101 1104 1115 1116 1117 1113 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,292
Write 1,104
Mixed 1,001
SusWrite 1,111
305% 1,377 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 72.1
275% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1394
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1074
843% 1,173 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 298%
Great: 404%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc SD5-5600 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
136% Outstanding
MC Read 55.2
MC Write 51
MC Mixed 52.2
151% 52.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 26.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 136%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 120 31.5" 1280 720 MSI5DA6 MSI G32C4W
Typical 82S0 Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82S0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback