Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82MF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 06:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 70.2
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 862
83% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,123
70% 1,123 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 31.7
16% 23.1 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 20.2
16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-4D512-Q62 512GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1U262
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 397 340 417 342 344 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 2,077
Write 494
Mixed 586
SusWrite 375
192% 883 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 17.9
104% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 496
DQ Mixed 303
329% 561 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 167%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC8T1-B8DS HT Micron HTH5AN8G6NDJR-XND 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 19.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 20
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 LEN9051
Typical 82MF Builds (Compare 250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback