Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8399
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171102
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 08 '24 at 07:26
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 192
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 664
64% 525 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
HP(103C 8424) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 21.4
13% 21.6 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 25.3
19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFME0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1068 502 284 279 289 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 928
Write 1,162
Mixed 1,008
SusWrite 451
200% 887 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 37.3
122% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 284
209% 276 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 115%
Great: 283%
JMicron 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0223
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 134 133 136 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 313
Write 118
Mixed 197
SusWrite 134
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 16.6
55% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 66.1
DQ Write 54.1
DQ Mixed 61.3
46% 60.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 62%
Kingston A400 480GB-$30
415GB free
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 434 331 172 104 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 287
Write 106
Mixed 109
SusWrite 292
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 32.6
4K Mixed 21.7
74% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 61.2
DQ Write 88.8
DQ Mixed 122
79% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 102%
Spcc Sol id State Disk 1TB
268GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.4% Very poor
Read 54.1
Write 37.1
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 37.4
9% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 8.4
32% 9.13 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
330GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 151 156 152 141 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 145
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 149
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11,947
Mixed 63.4
4,293% 6,005 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6MFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 18.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 0P 5R 9G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 39% 36 195 55 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ7F14 BenQ XL2720T
Typical Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx Builds (Compare 376 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback