Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 224%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics199% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive445% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory114.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 07 '24 at 19:25
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$594
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 73.6
1-Core 215
2-Core 426
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 834
8-Core 1,596
144% 1,215 Pts
64-Core 3,623
224% 3,623 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 D475) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.22030.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 257
Parallax 497
210% 337 fps
MRender 328
Gravity 313
Splatting 288
251% 310 fps
Poor: 103%
This bench: 199%
Great: 203%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$110
681GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4219 4287 1944 1506 1527 1572 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
445% Outstanding
Read 3,189
Write 4,203
Mixed 3,429
SusWrite 2,509
753% 3,332 MB/s
4K Read 63.4
4K Write 202
4K Mixed 96.7
327% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,569
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 1,394
1,045% 1,399 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 445%
Great: 507%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$110
452GB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4803 4970 1687 1435 1409 1442 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
469% Outstanding
Read 3,189
Write 5,047
Mixed 3,502
SusWrite 2,624
813% 3,590 MB/s
4K Read 72.8
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 110
385% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 1,571
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,025% 1,378 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 469%
Great: 507%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK32GX5M1B5600C40 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (85th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
183% Outstanding
MC Read 110
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 58
201% 70.3 GB/s
SC Read 45
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 43.5
128% 44.8 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 183%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27" 1280 720 VSC7F34 VP2785 SERIES
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $2,442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback