Today's hottest deals

Packard imedia S1360

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard imedia S1360  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S1360
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '24 at 18:47
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU-$120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Memory 30.5
1-Core 13.5
2-Core 24.4
16% 22.8 Pts
4-Core 24.7
8-Core 24.7
3% 24.7 Pts
64-Core 24
2% 24 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3545) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.8
2% 2 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 512G 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HS14752
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 100 162 179 174 179 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 186
Write 177
Mixed 186
SusWrite 157
40% 177 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 11.3
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 53.9
DQ Write 36.7
18% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 HU524303EP0200 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.01% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 1.2
MC Mixed 2.3
6% 2.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 304
13% 304 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 60 46 60 19" 1280 720 LEN114F LEN L1900pA
Typical imedia S1360 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S1360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $120
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback