Acer Nitro ANV16-41

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro ANV16-41  (all builds)
MotherboardHWK RZ_HKH
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240402
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '24 at 12:57
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 52.9
1-Core 187
2-Core 361
101% 200 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 1,057
94% 794 Pts
64-Core 1,215
75% 1,215 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 760M Graphics
Acer(1025 172C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.32
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.1% Below average
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 53.2
30% 37 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 58.7
37% 42.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2550_MTFDKBA1T0TGE 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3226 2555 1588 1602 1172 686 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
307% Outstanding
Read 1978
Write 3,768
Mixed 2,439
SusWrite 1,805
567% 2,497 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 72.2
234% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,289
DQ Write 702
DQ Mixed 1,147
812% 1,046 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66AGBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 49.9
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 38
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 36.6
82% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 101%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 165 16" 1280 720 AUO80AD
Typical Nitro ANV16-41 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO

System: Acer Nitro ANV16-41

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $268Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $88
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback