Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateJul 06 '24 at 10:34
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$155
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 668
64% 531 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 98.6
Reflection 113
Parallax 104
80% 105 fps
MRender 96.1
Gravity 103
Splatting 100
82% 99.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 128GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 725
Write 1,060
Mixed 872
200% 886 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 63
211% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 556
DQ Mixed 652
499% 683 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 190%
Colorful CN600 256GB PRO
39GB free
Firmware: H230715a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1485
Write 1,591
Mixed 962
300% 1,346 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 64.9
219% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 642
505% 711 MB/s
Poor: 151% Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BA08G3200D4TP16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.9
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 3% 30 211 56 100 34" 3440 1440 PHL093E PHL 346B1C
Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $712
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback