Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Laptop 16-ag0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 16-ag0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8CBC
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '24 at 22:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 53.9
1-Core 179
2-Core 340
97% 191 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 563
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 978
60% 978 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon TM Graphics
HP(103C 8CBC) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.44
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.8% Poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 36.6
17% 27.5 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 43.3
28% 32.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 37%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NHAV
SusWrite @10s intervals: 869 921 919 1291 1319 1245 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,473
Write 1,352
Mixed 1,186
SusWrite 1,094
287% 1,276 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 50
161% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 617
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 643
426% 514 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 196%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G56AK6BX069N 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 43.6
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 44.9
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 108%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 16" 1536 889 LGD0796
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback